5+ - 5+

This convention provides specialised sequences for accurate bidding of hands with 2 suits of 5 or more cards & <7LTC.
 

There are 6 sequences that BETA provides starting with the opening bid to announce hands with 2 5+ card suits. ABSOLUTE MINIMUM SPECIFICATION IS SIMPLY <=6.5LTC.

In BETA the following strong hands are absolutely NEVER to be considered as 5-5+ hands:

Counting LTC of 5-5+ hands

In each suit of 5 or more cards count 1LTC for each A or K or Q missing
Thats uo to 3LTC in each of your 5+ cards suits
In each of the short suits:
A Void or singleton A count 0LTC.
Other singletons count 1
Doubletons count 1 for each A or K missing
Tripleton: count 1 for each A,KorQ missing ; count 1 for each missing A or K or Q

Arrival Routes from Opening bid

1 or 1 opening and a 3 rebid with or without a jump! showing 5-5+ in Spades & Clubs or Diamonds & Clubs te: a 2 rebid shows 5|4 cards.

Pls Take note that jump responses to the 3 level in a new suit are Break-outs with long suits.
Also: 1mi - 3mi (same minor are also pre-emptive in nature - part of the inverted minor convention.)
Also: 2Ma - 3mi shows 6+ card minor weak also denies Major support
Also: 2D - 3mi shows 6+ card minor weak

Remember in BETA that any response in a new suit bid without jump is to be considered forcing for 1 round. [This is BETA's change of suit rule enforced as we have long abandoned the classical rebid  'reversing values']. Paired with this is the usage of BETA's Forcing Negative Double which we can use freely in our auctions -

Arrival routes by means of o'calls
c) Shown By 3mi jump overcalls <= 5LTC
d) Shown by a 1N overcall and 2 rebid <= 5LTC
BETA's 55+ convention now Kicks in following any of the above introductory sequences AUTOMATICALLY.

Note: Following all the above sequences showing  5-5 or better the responder is considered to be fully in control.
Only the responder has the responsibility of choosing the denomination and level of the final bid. The 5-5 holder is expected to accept this with the possibility ONLY with good reason to increase the level BUT NEVER the denomination.


Responder's 1st decision to be made: 

1st Key decision: Consider if at least game is probable, is there a reasonable possibility of a slam to be bid? If there is: issue a 3NT key distributional inquiry bid, else bid game directly if that's the limit of the hand as you see it.  Nevertheless  making a 3NT request in most cases  makes sense  when  your intention  is  a Major game. When heading for a minor game bidding bidding of the preferred minor gives partner the message to consider game if he has that necessary extra!
If game is not in sight: aim to close the bidding safely at the 3-level. [Partner will have an option to continue to game if  holding additional values compared to those shown so far:- just bid the chosen suit without jump.

On very rare occasions neither of partners suit is fitted to your hand BUT you hold a 7+ card suit:-  Beta allows you a breakout option to bid your suit - not one of the 5-5 suits partner declared to close the bidding. Very frequently it will work out better to go for a break-out!

Summary:

Responding to our 3NT inquiry:

Now a Second decision has be made:

Following the 3N 'shape' inquiry which determines shape information - essentially where the shortage is.
This key information gives a strong  insight into how the two hands fit together.
If it appears that there are 2 losers: bid 5 of  your preferred suit.  Partner may adjust only with good reason: e.g. you are 6-5-1-A partner will think you have 2 losers in D's this could be a good reason to raise the 'final' contract 1-level....
Bid 4N to request a precise LTC count from partner if you are confident the total loser tally is <=3.

Responding to our 4N inquiry

A final asking bid of 5N can be made on known 6-5 or better hands ONLY

Here you will be asking about the  LTC in the other 2 suits ONLY when distribution is known to be 6-5 or 6-6 or 6-7! 
This will give you two pieces of further deduction:
These refinements should enable one to make a shrewd decision on chances of a grand etc!

FINAL WORD. This now needs a good workout in the field. We will learn the strengths and weaknesses which could lead to further innovation.

Remember a 6 level contract is worth bidding on a known 50%+ chance.
However a 7 level contract needs to be 75+%

Handling Intervention

On occasions an opponents intervention may lie beyond your intended 3N or 4N asking bid - now a 3N inquiry is announced by a *|**.  Opener replies as normal in 4 steps. Similarly interference blocking a 4N inquiry is signalled by *|**

If opener has  seen a 3N bid or * by his partner and an intervention is made by an opponent the four steps follow our usua standard in conventional situationsl::
PASS
*|**
+1
+2

Final remark never respond 4N or 5N without passing through 3N & 4N. Responder should treat these bids if they occur by choosing his preferred suit at the next level. [preference given first to the longer suit  and tf equal in length then show the suit with the lower LTC].
                                                                                       -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-